Edinburgh Research Explorer

A rose by any other name?: Transdisciplinarity in the context of UK research policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related Edinburgh Organisations

Access status

Open

Documents

  • Download as Adobe PDF

    Rights statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Futures. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Futures, 65 (2015), 10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.009

    Accepted author manuscript, 229 KB, PDF-document

http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016328714001323
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)150–162
JournalFutures
Volume65
Early online date21 Aug 2014
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2015

Abstract

This paper assesses developments in transdisciplinary research in the UK. While we support the thesis that transdisciplinarity is still not mainstream and is rarely supported per se by funders of research, this paper examines the extent to which UK research policy has embraced the concept of transdisciplinarity. Five empirical case studies provide data about the interrelationship between the interdisciplinary and impact or knowledge exchange aspirations of Research Council UK (RCUK) investments. We find evidence that, to an extent, UK research funding policy is achieving some elements of transdisciplinarity in practice, if not in name.

Drawing on broader debates about the limitations of knowledge mobilisation and the challenges of conducting interdisciplinary research, we reflect on how the situation has changed since our original 2004 paper. The evidence suggests that the absence of the ‘transdisciplinary’ label is not necessarily impeding the framing of research funding schemes oriented towards societal issues. Nevertheless, several areas where capacity-building is required, including training for early career interdisciplinary researchers; improved research leadership skills; and the capacity to evaluate the quality of transdisciplinary processes and to learn from such evaluations, are identified.

Research areas

  • UK, Impact, Knowledge exchange, Transdisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Knowledge mobilisation, Training

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 18080311