RC21: Rethinking Global Urban Justice

Travlou, P. (Organiser)

Activity: Participating in or organising an event typesParticipation in conference

Description

Co-Convenor - Session 58: A Self-Reproducing Movement? Everyday Failures and Queer Solidarities Session Abstract Ever rising inequalities and hardening conditions of everyday struggles in cities enforce injustice along intersecting dimensions of class, race, and gender. In many urban centres, these conditions have led to collective activities targeting both everyday individual problems such as (un-)employment and a lack of adequate housing while at the same time fostering solidarity building processes within social movements. Silvia Federici (2006) coined the term of a ‘self-reproducing movement’ which emphasises the need to more closely entangle political activism with daily reproductive work. How can social movements comprise urgency for solidarities transgressing one’s own subjectivity and group belonging while looking after oneself in a collective practice of social reproduction? And in the meantime not end up tame and deprived of radical, autonomous, and emancipatory imagination and action? Movements are challenged by institutionalisation into parliamentary politics, police repression, the aim to be inclusive to newcomers (e.g. refugees, migrants) deprived of (full) citizenship rights, establishing a linkage to workers struggles, maintaining transnational networks and the everyday struggles in the local neighbourhoods. Instead of analysing possible reasons for declining and splitting social movements, in this session we seek to learn from current tensions within radical thought and practice. A transdisciplinary approach seems necessary if we seek to get involved with (self-) destructive movement tensions, between sturdy efforts and harsh everyday life conditions. Feminism paves the way for recognising care and affect while queer studies encourage for a playful doubting of established categories in social movement research such as: activist vs outsider, supporter vs recipient, radical vs conformist. This ‘politics of care’ makes possible the development of a political consciousness in which caring is invoked as a symbol of power to build a different kind of community and citizenship. Measuring everyday efforts as either successful or not hides the various ways in which practices of solidarity are effective and meaningful. Recently, Jack/Judith Halberstam has made the claim that if success as a category is tainted by the injustice of the dominant system, failure becomes a more attractive terrain. For a self-reproducing movement to flourish, it seems of central concern to re-examine failure both in theory and practice. The session encouraged an open discussion on both theoretical and case study centred papers (and those who cannot separate the two).
Period11 Sep 201713 Sep 2017
Event typeConference
LocationLeeds, United Kingdom

Keywords

  • feminist methodologies
  • solidarity
  • queer studies
  • politics of care
  • transdisciplinarity
  • social movements