Abstract
Software packages for cortical parcellation generally combine tools which segment the brain into various regions, or volumes, and provide corresponding measurements, or morphometrics. The results are used for volumetric, region-of-interest (ROI) and connectivity analysis, offering a better understanding of these volumes in the population(s) under investigation. It is therefore crucial to understand how these regions are defined, or the segmentation protocol of a package, as this has significant implications on the analysis that follows. Most segmentation protocols consist of a cortical parcellation protocol as well as a subcortical segmentation protocol. Here we focus on the cortical parcellation protocols of 4 software packages- BrainGyrusMapping, FreeSurfer, BrainSuite and BrainVISA- and have identified differences between them with regards to variability handling, as well as inconsistency in gyral border definitions, and limited reference population details. We therefore recommend serious consideration of these aspects while identifying the suitable package.
Data Citation
Mikhael, Shadia. (2016). Analysis of 4 Cortical Parcellation Protocols, [image]. University of Edinburgh. Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.7488/ds/1576.
| Date made available | 6 Dec 2016 |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Edinburgh DataShare |
Research output
- 1 Article
-
A controlled comparison of thickness, volume and surface areas from multiple cortical parcellation packages
Mikhael, S. & Pernet, C. R., 29 Jan 2019, In: BMC Bioinformatics. 12 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- DataSetCite