A Framework-based Exploration of Typologies for Climate Governance: Lessons Learned from the Edinburgh Climate Commission

This report utilises the lessons learned from the Edinburgh Climate Commission (ECC) to inform the development of a framework that explores 3 typologies for improved place-based climate governance. After selecting a recommended typology, the report goes further to outline 2 practical applications of this in Edinburgh. It also presents a checklist of 17 key considerations that must be accounted for when designing, setting up, running, evaluating and decommissioning a place-based climate governance model.

It is clear that a CGP can add value in Edinburgh. The recommended typology for a CGP to deliver positive climate outcomes in Edinburgh is the ‘Task and Finish Group’ typology. This was selected as it is the most integrated, adaptive and dynamic typology. It addresses specific place-based issues in a time-conscious manner and tackles the overwhelming challenge of climate change systematically.
Additionally, this approach confronts contemporary and shape-shifting issues in the place and enables solutions to be relevant and applicable in real time. These characteristics are key as they successfully mirror the ever-changing nature of climate change and are designed with the place in mind. Furthermore, unlike the other typologies, this model intentionally and efficiently targets precise stakeholders who must be engaged to tackle the specific issue at hand rather than engaging widespread stakeholders less thoroughly. By collaborating and building partnerships with those at the epicentre of Edinburgh’s climate response, a CGP essentially works with those who have the greatest ability to deliver positive climate outcomes.

This CGP typology is best placed to operate at the local level. There are many levers that a CGP has the ability to pull such as stimulating dialogue with and between stakeholders, encouraging stakeholder engagement and empowerment, highlighting ‘dropped balls’ in the climate landscape, scrutinising the pace, quality and direction of climate action, providing independent guidance and expertise, identifying pathways for greater decarbonisation and resilience, strengthening collaboration and communication, and supporting improved decision-making and coordination.

A checklist of 17 key considerations that must be accounted for when designing, setting up, running, evaluating and decommissioning a place-based climate governance model were also presented.