A 5′ UTR-mediated translational efficiency mechanism inhibits the Candida albicans morphological transition

Delma S. Childers, Vasanthakrishna Mundodi, Mohua Banerjee, David Kadosh*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Summary: While virulence properties of Candida albicans, the most commonly isolated human fungal pathogen, are controlled by transcriptional and post-translational mechanisms, considerably little is known about the role of post-transcriptional, and particularly translational, mechanisms. We demonstrate that UME6, a key filament-specific transcriptional regulator whose expression level is sufficient to determine C.albicans morphology and promote virulence, has one of the longest 5′ untranslated regions (UTRs) identified in fungi to date, which is predicted to form a complex and extremely stable secondary structure. The 5′ UTR inhibits the ability of UME6, when expressed at constitutive high levels, to drive complete hyphal growth, but does not cause a reduction in UME6 transcript. Deletion of the 5′ UTR increases C.albicans filamentation under a variety of conditions but does not affect UME6 transcript level or induction kinetics. We show that the 5′ UTR functions to inhibit Ume6 protein expression under several filament-inducing conditions and specifically reduces association of the UME6 transcript with polysomes. Overall, our findings suggest that translational efficiency mechanisms, known to regulate diverse biological processes in bacterial and viral pathogens as well as higher eukaryotes, have evolved to inhibit and fine-tune morphogenesis, a key virulence trait of many human fungal pathogens.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)570-585
Number of pages16
JournalMolecular Microbiology
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2014


Dive into the research topics of 'A 5′ UTR-mediated translational efficiency mechanism inhibits the Candida albicans morphological transition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this