A Bayesian framework for knowledge attribution: Evidence from semantic integration

Derek Powell, Zachary Horne, N. Angel Pinillos, Keith J. Holyoak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We propose a Bayesian framework for the attribution of knowledge, and apply this framework to generate novel predictions about knowledge attribution for different types of “Gettier cases”, in which an agent is led to a justified true belief yet has made erroneous assumptions. We tested these predictions using a paradigm based on semantic integration. We coded the frequencies with which participants falsely recalled the word “thought” as “knew” (or a near synonym), yielding an implicit measure of conceptual activation. Our experiments confirmed the predictions of our Bayesian account of knowledge attribution across three experiments. We found that Gettier cases due to counterfeit objects were not treated as knowledge (Experiment 1), but those due to intentionally-replaced evidence were (Experiment 2). Our findings are not well explained by an alternative account focused only on luck, because accidentally-replaced evidence activated the knowledge concept more strongly than did similar false belief cases (Experiment 3). We observed a consistent pattern of results across a number of different vignettes that varied the quality and type of evidence available to agents, the relative stakes involved, and surface details of content. Accordingly, the present findings establish basic phenomena surrounding people’s knowledge attributions in Gettier cases, and provide explanations of these phenomena within a Bayesian framework.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-104
JournalCognition
Volume139
Early online date23 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Mar 2015

Keywords

  • knowledge
  • Bayesian reasoning
  • implicit memory
  • semantic integration
  • false memory

Cite this