Abstract
The last four decades have seen the emergence and flourishing of the field of bioethics and its incorporation into wide-ranging aspects of society, from the clinic or laboratory through to public policy and the media. Yet considerable debate still exists over what bioethics is and how it should be done. In this paper I consider the question of what makes good bioethics. Drawing on historical and contemporary examples, I suggest that bioethics encompasses multiple modes of responding to moral disagreement, and that an awareness of which mode is operational in a given context is essential to doing good bioethics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 17-21 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Medical Ethics |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 16 Dec 2014 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- MORAL PHILOSOPHERS
- EXPERTS
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A bioethics for all seasons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver