A case study of argumentation at undergraduate level in History

Richard Andrews*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines two essays by undergraduate students in the first year of study in History at a university in the UK. It also draws on documentary evidence from the department in question and interviews with the students themselves to paint a picture of the way argumentation operates at this level. While no firm conclusions can be drawn, the evidence suggests a department with a high degree of awareness of the importance of argument and argumentation in studying History; and students who are aware and articulate about the problem facing them in constructing essays in the discipline. Suggestions are made about induction into the epistemological and argumentative demands of undergraduate study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)547-558
Number of pages12
JournalArgumentation
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2009

Keywords

  • Argumentation
  • Documents
  • Essay
  • History
  • Interview
  • Undergraduate

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A case study of argumentation at undergraduate level in History'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this