A Conditional Zebrafish MITF Mutation Reveals MITF Levels Are Critical for Melanoma Promotion vs. Regression In Vivo

James A. Lister*, Amy Capper, Zhiqiang Zeng, Marie E. Mathers, Jennifer Richardson, Karthika Paranthaman, Ian J. Jackson, E Elizabeth Patton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is the "master melanocyte transcription factor" with a complex role in melanoma. MITF protein levels vary between and within clinical specimens, and amplifications and gain- and loss-of-function mutations have been identified in melanoma. How MITF functions in melanoma development and the effects of targeting MITF in vivo are unknown because MITF levels have not been directly tested in a genetic animal model. Here, we use a temperature-sensitive mitf zebrafish mutant to conditionally control endogenous MITF activity. We show that low levels of endogenous MITF activity are oncogenic with BRAF(V600E) to promote melanoma that reflects the pathology of the human disease. Remarkably, abrogating MITF activity in BRAF(V600E) mitf melanoma leads to dramatic tumor regression marked by melanophage infiltration and increased apoptosis. These studies are significant because they show that targeting MITF activity is a potent antitumor mechanism, but also show that caution is required because low levels of wild-type MITF activity are oncogenic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-140
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Investigative Dermatology
Volume134
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • MICROPHTHALMIA TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
  • CUTANEOUS MALIGNANT-MELANOMA
  • MET EXPRESSION
  • STEM-CELLS
  • LINEAGE
  • PROLIFERATION
  • PREDISPOSES
  • MELANOCYTES
  • PHENOTYPE
  • ONCOGENE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Conditional Zebrafish MITF Mutation Reveals MITF Levels Are Critical for Melanoma Promotion vs. Regression In Vivo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this