A dog story from Newfoundland (revisited)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This paper addresses the question of how and why we (anthropologists and sociologists) tell stories of real people doing real stuff. It will consider this question by reflecting on three versions of a story that I have carried with me and told in variety of contexts over a couple of decades. The story is not mine but was originally told to me by a man while I was visiting a village on the coast of Newfoundland, Canada. In (re)telling three versions of this story I will be focusing on the problem of “voice” and how the voice of the other is constituted. In answering the question of how and why we tell tales of the field, I will suggest that we do so in part so other people, other voices, come to inhabit our accounts thereby rendering them “ethnographic.” The paper will conclude by arguing that our finely detailed accounts play a crucial role in both constituting the authoritative voice of the anthropologist and troubling this voice with the ghostly whispers of other voices which inhabit our narratives even if, as is the way with ghosts, they can never be wholly conjured into full presence and complete intelligibility.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology
Issue number2
Early online date30 Dec 2014
Publication statusPublished - 2014


Dive into the research topics of 'A dog story from Newfoundland (revisited)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this