A Foreign Policy Analysis perspective on the domestic politics turn in IR Theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Over the last 25 years, there has been a noteworthy turn across major International Relations (IR) theories to include domestic politics and decision-making factors. Neoclassical realism and variants of liberalism and constructivism, for example, have incorporated state motives, perceptions, domestic political institutions, public opinion, and political culture. These theoretical developments, however, have largely ignored decades of research in foreign policy analysis (FPA) examining how domestic political and decision-making factors affect actors’ choices and policies. This continues the historical disconnect between FPA and “mainstream” IR, resulting in contemporary IR theories that are considerably underdeveloped. This article revisits the reasons for this separation and demonstrates the gaps between IR theory and FPA research. I argue that a distinct FPA perspective, one that is psychologically oriented and agent-based, can serve as a complement, a competitor, and an integrating crucible for the cross-theoretical turn toward domestic politics and decision making in IR theory.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-216
JournalInternational Studies Review
Volume17
Issue number2
Early online date17 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jun 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Foreign Policy Analysis perspective on the domestic politics turn in IR Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this