A machine walks into an exhibit: A technical analysis of art curation

Thomas S ̧erban von Davier*, Laura Herman, Caterina Moruzzi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Contemporary art consumption is predominantly online, driven by algorithmic recom- mendation systems that dictate artwork visibility. Despite not being designed for curation, these algorithms’ machinic ways of seeing play a pivotal role in shaping visual culture, influencing artistic creation, visibility, and associated social and financial benefits. The Algorithmic Pedestal was a gallery, practice-based research project that reported gallerygoers’ perceptions of a human’s curation and cu- ration achieved by Instagram’s algorithm. This paper presents a technical analysis of the same exhibit using computer vision code, offering insights into machines’ perception of visual art. The computer vision code assigned values on various metrics to each image, allowing statistical comparisons to identify differences between the collections of images selected by the human and the algorithmic system. The analysis reveals statistically significant differences between the exhibited images and the broader Metropolitan Museum of Art digital collection. However, the analysis found minimal distinctions between human-curated and Instagram-curated images. This study contributes insights into the perceived value of the curation process, shedding light on how audiences perceive artworks differently from machines using computer vision.
Original languageEnglish
Article number138
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalArts
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Aug 2024

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • curation
  • machine perception
  • computer vision
  • computational aesthetics
  • art exhibit
  • AI
  • art data

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A machine walks into an exhibit: A technical analysis of art curation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this