‘A new normative architecture’–risk and resilience as routines of un-governance

Dimitri Van Den Meerssche, Geoff Gordon*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Our contribution describes a reorientation in the intelligibility of governance practices authorised under international law. Observing the World Bank, we narrate new managerial attitudes and organisational routines that exhibit heightened ‘risk appetites’. Risk and complexity are no longer seen as limiting conditions on the institutional project, but as co-constitutive elements and constructive tools, including new sets of heuristics aimed at governing with and through contingency and unknowability. The practices that we observe are characterised by adaptive, iterative and recursive routines, flexibly attuned to immanent possibilities and aims of resilience. We situate these changes in a genealogy of governmentality, focusing on the relation to a ‘surplus of life’, or unruly elements of populations that persistently escape productive incorporation into the closure of institutional programmes. The World Bank’s turn to resilience as a particular rationality of reform signals an institutional attempt to enrol what has escaped prior efforts at determinate institutional intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-299
Number of pages33
JournalTransnational Legal Theory
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Oct 2020

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • governmentality
  • resilience
  • risk
  • surplus of life
  • World Bank

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '‘A new normative architecture’–risk and resilience as routines of un-governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this