A painful end for perfectionism?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

This paper examines perfectionist attempts to explain the prudential badness of pain (its badness for those who experience it). It starts by considering simple perfectionist explanations, finding them wanting, before considering the most sophisticated perfectionist attempt to explain prudential badness: Gwen Bradford’s tripartite perfectionism. The paper argues that Bradford’s view, though an improvement on earlier perfectionist proposals, still does not satisfactorily explain the full set of prudentially bad pains. It ends by showing how this provides grounds for a general kind of pessimism about perfectionism and the badness of pain and how this case undermines a general purported advantage of perfectionism over the objective list theory.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMidwest Studies In Philosophy
Early online date2 Dec 2022
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Dec 2022

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • pain
  • well-being
  • ill-being
  • perfectionism
  • objective list theory
  • explanation
  • infant pain
  • practical rationality


Dive into the research topics of 'A painful end for perfectionism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this