Abstract / Description of output
This paper presents an empirical assessment of four state-of-the-art risk-averse approaches to deal with the capacitated lot-sizing problem under stochastic demand. We analyze two mean-risk models based on the semideviation and on the conditional value-at-risk risk measures, and alternate first and second-order stochastic dominance approaches. The extensive computational experiments based on different instances characteristics and on a case-study suggest that CVaR exhibits a good tradeoff between risk and performance, followed by the semideviation and first-order stochastic dominance approach. For all approaches, enforcing risk-aversion helps to reduce the cost standard deviation substantially, which is usually accomplished via increasing production rates. Overall, we can say that very risk-averse decision-makers would be willing to pay an increased price to have a much less risky solution given by CVaR. In less risk-averse settings, though, semideviation and first-order stochastic dominance can be appealing alternatives to provide significantly more stable production planning costs with a marginal increase of the expected costs
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2581-2603 |
Journal | International Journal of Production Research |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 28 May 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2020 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- lot-sizing
- two-stage stochastic programming
- risk-aversion
- CVaR
- semideviation
- first-order stochastic dominance
- second-order stochastic dominance