Abstract
I present a hitherto unremarked conflict involving Hume's claim that certain "fictions of the imagination"-like that of an unchangeable, yet enduring object-are "improper," "inexact," or not "strict." I argue that this claim is inconsistent with other commitments that he has, concerning how the imagination produces fictions and how we form general representations. I consider several ways in which he would likely respond to this charge, and argue that he cannot consistently accept any of them. I conclude that we face an unsolved puzzle: how best to develop or amend Hume's views, so as to remove the conflict that I have identified?.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 47-73 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Journal of the History of Philosophy |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 Jan 2016 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- abstract ideas
- David Hume
- distance
- duration
- fiction
- identity
- imagination
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Puzzle about Fictions in the Treatise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver