TY - JOUR
T1 - A Regency Drama
T2 - Misrepresentation by Appearance, Reduction and Restitutio in Integrum
AU - Hogg, Martin
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - This article examines (i) whether the mere appearance of goods can constitute an actionable misrepresentation, and (ii) whether restitutio in integrum following avoidance of a contract should continue to be viewed as a contractual matter, rather than as an aspect of unjustified enrichment. The discussion is set within the context of the recent decision in Lyon & Turnbull v Sabine [2012] CSOH 178.
AB - This article examines (i) whether the mere appearance of goods can constitute an actionable misrepresentation, and (ii) whether restitutio in integrum following avoidance of a contract should continue to be viewed as a contractual matter, rather than as an aspect of unjustified enrichment. The discussion is set within the context of the recent decision in Lyon & Turnbull v Sabine [2012] CSOH 178.
U2 - 10.3366/elr.2013.0156
DO - 10.3366/elr.2013.0156
M3 - Article
SN - 1364-9809
VL - 17
SP - 256
EP - 264
JO - Edinburgh Law Review
JF - Edinburgh Law Review
IS - 2
ER -