A Rights-based Analysis of DNA Retention: "Non-conviction" Databases and the Liberal State

Liz Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Discusses the human and civil rights implications of the retention of DNA samples, in particular in cases where taken from suspects who remain unconvicted. Considers whether the retention of the samples of innocent individuals is open to challenge by way of the right to privacy, the presumption of innocence or the right not to be stigmatised. Compares the position to retention adopted under English, Scottish, European Court of Human Rights and US law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)889-905
Number of pages17
JournalCriminal Law Review
Volume[2010]
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • DNA Samples
  • Good character
  • Presumption of innocence
  • Privacy
  • Retention

Access to Document

  • A Rights-based Analysis of DNA Retention

    RIGHTS © 2011 Thomson Reuters (Professional) UK Limited The Criminal Law Review is published by Thomson Reuters (Legal) Limited (Registered in England & Wales, Company No 1679046. Registered Office and address for service: 100 Avenue Road, London, NW3 3PF) trading as Sweet & Maxwell. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature without prior written permission, except for permitted fair dealing under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or in accordance with the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in respect of photocopying and/or reprographic reproduction. Application for permission for other use of copyright material including permission to reproduce extracts in other published works shall be made to the publishers. Full acknowledgement of author, publisher and source must be given.

    Final published version, 80.8 KB

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Rights-based Analysis of DNA Retention: "Non-conviction" Databases and the Liberal State'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this