A strategy for generating evaluative arguments

Giuseppe Carenini; Johanna D. Moore

A strategy for generating evaluative arguments

Giuseppe Carenini, Johanna D. Moore

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

We propose an argumentation strategy for generating evaluative arguments that can be applied in systems serving as personal assistants or advisors. By following guidelines from argumentation theory and by employing a quantitative model of the user's preferences, the strategy generates arguments that are tailored to the user, properly arranged and concise. Our proposal extends the scope of previous
approaches both in terms of types of arguments generated, and in terms of compliance with principles from argumentation theory.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	INLG 2000 - Proceedings of the First International Natural Language Generation Conference, June 12-16, 2000, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel
Pages	47-54
Number of pages	8
Publication status	Published - 2000

Access to Document

Carenini Moore 2000 A Strategy for Generating Evaluative ArgumentsAccepted author manuscript, 656 KB

http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W00-1407

Cite this

@inproceedings{9a27a67d3150462ab677c083f961eeaf,

title = "A strategy for generating evaluative arguments",

abstract = "We propose an argumentation strategy for generating evaluative arguments that can be applied in systems serving as personal assistants or advisors. By following guidelines from argumentation theory and by employing a quantitative model of the user's preferences, the strategy generates arguments that are tailored to the user, properly arranged and concise. Our proposal extends the scope of previous approaches both in terms of types of arguments generated, and in terms of compliance with principles from argumentation theory. ",

author = "Giuseppe Carenini and Moore, \{Johanna D.\}",

year = "2000",

language = "English",

pages = "47--54",

booktitle = "INLG 2000 - Proceedings of the First International Natural Language Generation Conference, June 12-16, 2000, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A strategy for generating evaluative arguments

AU - Carenini, Giuseppe

AU - Moore, Johanna D.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - We propose an argumentation strategy for generating evaluative arguments that can be applied in systems serving as personal assistants or advisors. By following guidelines from argumentation theory and by employing a quantitative model of the user's preferences, the strategy generates arguments that are tailored to the user, properly arranged and concise. Our proposal extends the scope of previous approaches both in terms of types of arguments generated, and in terms of compliance with principles from argumentation theory.

AB - We propose an argumentation strategy for generating evaluative arguments that can be applied in systems serving as personal assistants or advisors. By following guidelines from argumentation theory and by employing a quantitative model of the user's preferences, the strategy generates arguments that are tailored to the user, properly arranged and concise. Our proposal extends the scope of previous approaches both in terms of types of arguments generated, and in terms of compliance with principles from argumentation theory.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 47

EP - 54

BT - INLG 2000 - Proceedings of the First International Natural Language Generation Conference, June 12-16, 2000, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel

ER -

A strategy for generating evaluative arguments

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this