A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research

SINAPSE Collaborative Grp, Joanna M. Wardlaw*, Will Brindle, Ana M. Casado, Kirsten Shuler, Moira Henderson, Brenda Thomas, Jennifer Macfarlane, Susana Munoz-Maniega, Katherine Lymer, Zoe Morris, Cyril Pernet, William Nailon, Trevor Ahearn, Abdul Nashirudeen Mumuni, Carlos Mugruza, John McLean, Goultchira Chakirova, Yuehui (Terry) Tao, Johanna SimpsonAndrew C. Stanfield, Harriet Johnston, Jehill Parikh, Natalie A. Royle, Janet De Wilde, Mark E. Bastin, Nick Weir, Andrew Farrall, Maria C Valdes Hernandez

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review of the utility of 1.5 versus 3 Tesla magnetic resonance brain imaging in clinical practice and research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Medicine & Life Sciences