While takeover targets earn significant abnormal returns, studies tend to find no abnormal returns from investing in predicted takeover targets. In this study, we show that the difficulty of correctly identifying targets ex ante does not fully explain the below-expected returns to target portfolios. Target prediction models’ inability to optimally time impending takeovers, by taking account of pre-bid target underperformance and the anticipation of potential targets by other market participants, diminishes but does not eliminate the potential profitability of investing in predicted targets. Importantly, we find that target portfolios are predisposed to underperform, as targets and distressed firms share common firm characteristics, resulting in the misclassification of a disproportionately high number of distressed firms as potential targets. We show that this problem can be mitigated, and significant risk-adjusted returns can be earned, by screening firms in target portfolios for size, leverage and liquidity.
|Journal||Journal of Business Finance and Accounting|
|Early online date||20 Jan 2016|
|Publication status||Published - 2016|
- takeover prediction
- abnormal returns
- portfolio strategies
- investment timing
- firm size
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Abnormal returns from takeover prediction modelling: Challenges and suggested investment strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- Business School - Baillie Gifford Chair in Fin Markets
- Accounting and Finance
- Corporate Finance
Person: Academic: Research Active