Abstract
Data access committees (DACs) are critical players in the data sharing ecosystem. DACs review requests for access to data held in one or more repositories, and where specific constraints determine how the data may be used and by whom. Our team surveyed DAC members affiliated with genomic data repositories worldwide to understand standard processes and procedures; operational metrics, bottlenecks, and efficiencies; as well as their perspectives on possible improvements to quality review. We found DAC operations and systemic issues were common across repositories globally. In general, DAC members endeavored to achieve an appropriate balance of review efficiency, quality, and compliance. Our results suggest a similarly proportionate path forward that helps DACs pursue mutual improvements to efficiency and compliance without sacrificing review quality.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Biopreservation and biobanking |
| Early online date | 16 May 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 16 May 2023 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- data access
- data sharing
- data management
- data use
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Achieving procedural parity in managing access to genomic and related health data: A global survey of data access committee (DAC) members'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver