Adaptiveness in proactive control engagement in children and adults

Nicolas Chevalier, Julie-Anne Meaney, Hilary Traut, Yuko Munakata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Adaptiveness in proactive control engagement3AbstractAge-related progress in cognitive control reflects more frequent engagement of proactive control during childhood. As proactive preparation for an upcoming task is adaptive only when the task can be reliably predicted, progress in proactive control engagement may rely on more efficient use of contextual cue reliability. Developmental progress may also reflect increasing efficiency in how proactive control is engaged, making this control mode more advantageous with age.To address these possibilities, 6-year-olds, 9-year-olds, and adults completed three versions of a cued task-switching paradigm in which contextual cue reliability was manipulated. When contextual cues were reliable(but not unreliable or uninformative), all age groups showed greater pupil dilation and a more pronounced pre cue-locked posterior positivity associated with faster response times, suggesting adaptive engagement of proactive task selection. However, adults additionally showed a larger contingent negative variation (CNV)predicting a further reduction in response times with reliable cues,suggesting motor preparation in adults but not children. Thus, early developing use of contextual cue reliability promotes adaptiveness in proactive control engagement from early childhood; yet, less efficient motor preparation in children makes this control mode overall less advantageous in childhood than adulthood.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100870
JournalDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume46
Early online date12 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Oct 2020

Keywords

  • cognitive control
  • executive function
  • proactive control
  • event-related potentials
  • pupillometry
  • children

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Adaptiveness in proactive control engagement in children and adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this