TY - JOUR
T1 - Advance care planning in primary care for cancer patients
T2 - Feasibility randomised trial
AU - Canny, Anne
AU - Mason, Bruce
AU - Stephen, Jacqueline
AU - Hopkins, Samantha
AU - Wall, Lucy
AU - Christie, Alan
AU - Skipworth, Richard
AU - Bowden, Joanna
AU - Graham, Louise
AU - Kendall, Marilyn
AU - Weir, Christopher J
AU - Boyd, Kirsty
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Macmillan Cancer Support (reference: 6488086). Christopher J Weir was also supported in this work by NHS Lothian via Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03719716).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Authors.
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Advance (anticipatory) care planning (ACP) requires discussions between patients and healthcare professionals about planning for future deterioration in health. ACP improves care coordination but uptake is limited and often deferred.AIM: To assess the feasibility and acceptability to patients, carers, and GPs of a primary care ACP intervention for people with incurable oesophageal, gastric, or pancreatic cancer.DESIGN AND SETTING: A 12-month feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) in a Scottish Cancer Network.METHOD: Patients aged ≥18 years starting palliative oncology treatment were randomised 1:1 to an ACP intervention or standard care. Patients in the intervention group received an oncologist letter supporting them to request a GP review along with a patient information leaflet about ACP. Pre-specified analyses with masking included trial recruitment and retention, ACP completion, and quality-of-life questionnaires (EuroQol EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP Supportive Care Measure) at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Qualitative interviews with purposive sampling explored patient, carer, and GP experiences.RESULTS: Of 99 eligible participants (269 screened), 46% were recruited (
n = 46) and randomised; 25 to intervention and 21 to control. By 12 weeks, 45% (
n = 9/20) of the individuals in the intervention and 59% (
n = 10/17) in the control group had a documented ACP plan. By 24 weeks, 30% (
n = 14) had died; in the remaining participants quality of life was maintained at 24 weeks except for physical symptoms. Social norms associating ACP with dying were prevalent among 23 participants interviewed. No psychological or clinical harms were identified.
CONCLUSION: An RCT of ACP for people with incurable cancer in primary care is feasible. Patient, carer, and GP attitudes and behaviours determined acceptability and timing of care planning.
AB - BACKGROUND: Advance (anticipatory) care planning (ACP) requires discussions between patients and healthcare professionals about planning for future deterioration in health. ACP improves care coordination but uptake is limited and often deferred.AIM: To assess the feasibility and acceptability to patients, carers, and GPs of a primary care ACP intervention for people with incurable oesophageal, gastric, or pancreatic cancer.DESIGN AND SETTING: A 12-month feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) in a Scottish Cancer Network.METHOD: Patients aged ≥18 years starting palliative oncology treatment were randomised 1:1 to an ACP intervention or standard care. Patients in the intervention group received an oncologist letter supporting them to request a GP review along with a patient information leaflet about ACP. Pre-specified analyses with masking included trial recruitment and retention, ACP completion, and quality-of-life questionnaires (EuroQol EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP Supportive Care Measure) at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Qualitative interviews with purposive sampling explored patient, carer, and GP experiences.RESULTS: Of 99 eligible participants (269 screened), 46% were recruited (
n = 46) and randomised; 25 to intervention and 21 to control. By 12 weeks, 45% (
n = 9/20) of the individuals in the intervention and 59% (
n = 10/17) in the control group had a documented ACP plan. By 24 weeks, 30% (
n = 14) had died; in the remaining participants quality of life was maintained at 24 weeks except for physical symptoms. Social norms associating ACP with dying were prevalent among 23 participants interviewed. No psychological or clinical harms were identified.
CONCLUSION: An RCT of ACP for people with incurable cancer in primary care is feasible. Patient, carer, and GP attitudes and behaviours determined acceptability and timing of care planning.
KW - advance care planning
KW - anticipatory care planning
KW - primary health care
KW - cancer
KW - general practice
KW - mixed methods research
U2 - 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0700
DO - 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0700
M3 - Article
C2 - 35760566
SN - 0960-1643
VL - 72
SP - e571-e580
JO - British Journal of General Practice
JF - British Journal of General Practice
IS - 721
M1 - BJGP.2021.0700
ER -