Against a Minimum Voting Age

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A minimum voting age is defended as the most effective and least disrespectful means of ensuring all members of an electorate are sufficiently competent to vote. Whilst it may be reasonable to require competency from voters, a minimum voting age should be rejected because its view of competence is unreasonably controversial, it is incapable of defining a clear threshold of sufficiency and an alternative test is available which treats children more respectfully. This alternative is a procedural test for minimum electoral competence. A procedural test for minimum electoral competence also succeeds in fulfilling adults’ duties to promote children’s rational and moral engagement with democracy. A minimum voting age should therefore be rejected, all things considered. A procedural test for minimum literacy and independent voting is the most justified means to ensure competency from voters and to promote the democratic agency of children.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-458
JournalCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Volume16
Issue number3
Early online date20 Jun 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2013

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • child-citizenship
  • child-suffrage
  • minimum voting age
  • electoral competence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Against a Minimum Voting Age'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this