Against Blameless Wrongdoing

Elinor Mason

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


I argue against the standard view that it is possible to describe extensionally different consequentialist theories by describing different evaluative focal points. I argue that for consequentialist purposes, the important sense of the word ?act? must include all motives and side effects, and thus these things cannot be separated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-303
Number of pages17
JournalEthical Theory and Moral Practice
Publication statusPublished - 2002


Dive into the research topics of 'Against Blameless Wrongdoing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this