Agreement Weakening at PF: A Reply to Benmamoun and Lorimor

Peter Ackema, Ad Neeleman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Benmamoun and Lorimor (2006) dispute the claim made in Ackema and Neeleman 2003 that certain agreement alternations in Standard Arabic, and various related phenomena, can successfully be analyzed in terms of postsyntactic spell-out rules that are sensitive to prosodic structure. In this reply, we argue that the data discussed by Benmamoun and Lorimor do not warrant their conclusion, and in fact provide further evidence in favor of our original analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-96
Number of pages22
JournalLinguistic Inquiry
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

Keywords

  • agreement alternations
  • Standard Arabic
  • Dutch,
  • prosodic domains
  • pro drop

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Agreement Weakening at PF: A Reply to Benmamoun and Lorimor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this