Agreement Weakening at PF: A Reply to Benmamoun and Lorimor

Peter Ackema; Ad Neeleman

doi:10.1162/LING_a_00074

Agreement Weakening at PF: A Reply to Benmamoun and Lorimor

Peter Ackema, Ad Neeleman

School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Benmamoun and Lorimor (2006) dispute the claim made in Ackema and Neeleman 2003 that certain agreement alternations in Standard Arabic, and various related phenomena, can successfully be analyzed in terms of postsyntactic spell-out rules that are sensitive to prosodic structure. In this reply, we argue that the data discussed by Benmamoun and Lorimor do not warrant their conclusion, and in fact provide further evidence in favor of our original analysis.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	75-96
Number of pages	22
Journal	Linguistic Inquiry
Volume	43
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00074
Publication status	Published - Dec 2012

Keywords

agreement alternations
Standard Arabic
Dutch,
prosodic domains
pro drop

Access to Document

10.1162/LING_a_00074

Agreement Weakening at PF: A Reply to Benmamoun and Lorimor
© 2012 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Ackema, P. & Neeleman, A. Dec 2012. "Agreement Weakening at PF: A Reply to Benmamoun and Lorimor". In : Linguistic Inquiry. 43, 1, p. 75-96. Final publication available at http://www.mitpressjournals.org/loi/ling
Final published version, 125 KB

http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/LING_a_00074

Cite this

@article{980aa1b7c5aa4a169ccffd7fbf583853,

title = "Agreement Weakening at PF: A Reply to Benmamoun and Lorimor",

abstract = "Benmamoun and Lorimor (2006) dispute the claim made in Ackema and Neeleman 2003 that certain agreement alternations in Standard Arabic, and various related phenomena, can successfully be analyzed in terms of postsyntactic spell-out rules that are sensitive to prosodic structure. In this reply, we argue that the data discussed by Benmamoun and Lorimor do not warrant their conclusion, and in fact provide further evidence in favor of our original analysis.",

keywords = "agreement alternations , Standard Arabic , Dutch, , prosodic domains , pro drop ",

author = "Peter Ackema and Ad Neeleman",

year = "2012",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1162/LING_a_00074",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "75--96",

journal = "Linguistic Inquiry",

issn = "0024-3892",

publisher = "MIT Press Journals",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agreement Weakening at PF: A Reply to Benmamoun and Lorimor

AU - Ackema, Peter

AU - Neeleman, Ad

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Benmamoun and Lorimor (2006) dispute the claim made in Ackema and Neeleman 2003 that certain agreement alternations in Standard Arabic, and various related phenomena, can successfully be analyzed in terms of postsyntactic spell-out rules that are sensitive to prosodic structure. In this reply, we argue that the data discussed by Benmamoun and Lorimor do not warrant their conclusion, and in fact provide further evidence in favor of our original analysis.

AB - Benmamoun and Lorimor (2006) dispute the claim made in Ackema and Neeleman 2003 that certain agreement alternations in Standard Arabic, and various related phenomena, can successfully be analyzed in terms of postsyntactic spell-out rules that are sensitive to prosodic structure. In this reply, we argue that the data discussed by Benmamoun and Lorimor do not warrant their conclusion, and in fact provide further evidence in favor of our original analysis.

KW - agreement alternations

KW - Standard Arabic

KW - Dutch,

KW - prosodic domains

KW - pro drop

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855745404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/LING_a_00074

DO - 10.1162/LING_a_00074

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 75

EP - 96

JO - Linguistic Inquiry

JF - Linguistic Inquiry

SN - 0024-3892

IS - 1

ER -

Agreement Weakening at PF: A Reply to Benmamoun and Lorimor

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this