Alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B Trial): Protocol for a multicentre phase 3 pragmatic clinical and cost-effectiveness randomised trial in the United Kingdom

Timothy S. Walsh*, Leanne M Aitken, Cathrine McKenzie, Julia Boyd, Alix Macdonald, Annabel Giddings, David Hope, John Norrie, Christopher J Weir, Richard A Parker, Nazir I Lone, Lydia M Emerson, Kalliopi Kydonaki, Ben Creagh-Brown, Stephen Morris, Danny F. McAuley, Paul Dark, Matt P. Wise, Anthony C Gordon, Gavin D PerkinsMichael C. Reade, Bronagh Blackwood, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Robert Glen, Valerie J Page

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Introduction
Almost all patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) in intensive care units (ICUs) require analgesia and sedation. The most widely used sedative drug is propofol, but there is uncertainty whether alpha2-agonists are superior. The A2B trial aims to determine whether clonidine or dexmedetomidine (or both) are clinically and cost-effective in MV ICU patients compared to usual care.

Methods and analysis
Adult ICU patients within 48 hours of starting MV, expected to require at least 24 hours further MV, are randomised in an open-label three arm trial to receive propofol (usual care) or clonidine or dexmedetomidine as primary sedative, plus analgesia according to local practice. Exclusions include patients with primary brain injury; post-cardiac arrest; other neurological conditions; or bradycardia. Unless clinically contra-indicated, sedation is titrated using weight-based dosing guidance to achieve a Richmond-Agitation-Sedation score of -2 or greater as early as considered safe by clinicians. The primary outcome is time to successful extubation. Secondary ICU outcomes include delirium and coma incidence/duration, sedation quality, predefined adverse events, mortality, and ICU length of stay. Post-ICU outcomes include mortality, anxiety and depression, post-traumatic stress, cognitive function, and health-related quality of life at 6-month follow-up. A process evaluation and health economic evaluation are embedded in the trial.
The analytic framework uses a hierarchical approach to maximise efficiency and control type I error. Stage 1 tests whether each alpha2-agonist is superior to propofol. If either/both interventions are superior, stage 2 and 3 testing explores which alpha2-agonist is more effective. To detect a mean difference of 2 days in MV duration, we aim to recruit 1437 patients (479 per group) in 40-50 UK ICUs.

Ethics and dissemination
The Scotland A REC approved the trial (18/SS/0085). We use a surrogate decision-maker or deferred consent model consistent with UK law. Dissemination will be via publications, presentations, and updated guidelines.


Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03653832
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere078645
Number of pages11
JournalBMJ Open
Volume13
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Dec 2023

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • Critical Illness
  • sedation
  • clinical trial
  • alpha2-agonists
  • mechanical ventilation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alpha 2 agonists for sedation to produce better outcomes from critical illness (A2B Trial): Protocol for a multicentre phase 3 pragmatic clinical and cost-effectiveness randomised trial in the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this