An analysis of the public’s personal, national and EU issue priorities

Shaun Bevan, Will Jennings, Christopher Wlezien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Scholars characterize decision-making in the European Union (EU) as increasingly dispersed across different levels of political authority. This has implications for political representation. Yet, little is known about whether and how public opinion differs across levels of governance. In this paper, we consider evaluations of issue priorities. Specifically, we use data from the Eurobarometer to evaluate the degree of correspondence between issues that citizens consider important to them personally, to their country and to the EU. We find generally weak relationships between different levels of governance, which suggests national issue priorities are distinct from both personal and EU priorities. The results indicate that more careful research is needed to understand how public priorities at different levels affect politics and policy in the EU.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)871-887
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume23
Issue number6
Early online date26 Aug 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2016

Keywords

  • European Union
  • issues
  • measurement
  • most important problem
  • public opinion
  • surveys

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An analysis of the public’s personal, national and EU issue priorities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • The Public Agenda: A Comparative Perspective

    Bevan, S. & Jennings, W., 22 Mar 2019, Comparative Policy Agendas: Theory, Tools, Data. Baumgartner, F., Breunig, C. & Grossman, E. (eds.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, p. 219-242

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Cite this