TY - JOUR
T1 - An explicit look at implicit learning
T2 - An interrogative review for sport coaching research and practice
AU - Collins, Dave
AU - MacPherson, Alan C
AU - Bobrownicki, Ray
AU - Carson, Howie J
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023/2/23
Y1 - 2023/2/23
N2 - Over the last three decades, implicit coaching has emerged as a potential skill acquisition tool and pre-emptive intervention to avoid choking under pressure. Despite advocacy in the sport coaching literature, however, we are concerned that theoretical, methodological, and practical issues have potentially inflated or obscured its utility for coaching practice. In this paper, we lay out and elaborate on these concerns in order to stimulate critical dialogue that benefits sport coaches, performers, and their support teams and better situates the tool within the realities of real-world practice and delivery. The main points addressed relate to the predominately academic focus, contentious investigative designs, need for internal checks, questioned mechanistic processes, recognised limitations of the approach, and its contribution to current and effective coaching practice. Based on this, we conclude that available implicit-instruction methods are impractical and presently offer limited utility for sport coaching. Going forward, if scholars are to establish the relevance and impact of implicit methods, then research must directly address and respond to the challenges presented in this paper and adopt a more pragmatic perspective that better accounts for applied sporting contexts.
AB - Over the last three decades, implicit coaching has emerged as a potential skill acquisition tool and pre-emptive intervention to avoid choking under pressure. Despite advocacy in the sport coaching literature, however, we are concerned that theoretical, methodological, and practical issues have potentially inflated or obscured its utility for coaching practice. In this paper, we lay out and elaborate on these concerns in order to stimulate critical dialogue that benefits sport coaches, performers, and their support teams and better situates the tool within the realities of real-world practice and delivery. The main points addressed relate to the predominately academic focus, contentious investigative designs, need for internal checks, questioned mechanistic processes, recognised limitations of the approach, and its contribution to current and effective coaching practice. Based on this, we conclude that available implicit-instruction methods are impractical and presently offer limited utility for sport coaching. Going forward, if scholars are to establish the relevance and impact of implicit methods, then research must directly address and respond to the challenges presented in this paper and adopt a more pragmatic perspective that better accounts for applied sporting contexts.
KW - analogy learning
KW - coaching
KW - pedagogy
KW - teaching strategies
KW - verbal instruction
UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/RSPC
U2 - 10.1080/21640629.2023.2179300
DO - 10.1080/21640629.2023.2179300
M3 - Article
SN - 2164-0629
JO - Sports Coaching Review
JF - Sports Coaching Review
ER -