Abstract
Nowadays, public–private partnership projects have become a standard for
delivering public services in both developed and developing countries. In this paper, we are concerned with the analysis of private sector proposals and the selection of the private sector partner to whom to award the contract. To the best of our knowledge, this problem has not been addressed within a game theory framework. To fill this gap, we model this decision problem as a static non-cooperative game of complete information and propose a new ordinal game theory algorithm for finding an optimal generalized Nash equilibrium. The proposed algorithm determines a single ranking of proposals or bidders that takes account of multiple performance criteria and reflects both the public sector and the private sector perspectives, and can handle any number of private sector players and any number of contractual terms. An illustrative scenario is provided to guide the reader through the workings of the proposed ordinal game theory algorithm. The proposed ordinal game theory-based analysis framework can
be used by the private sector to analyse any set of potential proposals most likely to be submitted by bidders and to assist with the choice of bidding strategies, and by the public sector player to analyse any set of potential proposals most likely to be submitted under any set of contractual terms and to assist with the choice of a realistic set of contractual terms and their performance measures.
delivering public services in both developed and developing countries. In this paper, we are concerned with the analysis of private sector proposals and the selection of the private sector partner to whom to award the contract. To the best of our knowledge, this problem has not been addressed within a game theory framework. To fill this gap, we model this decision problem as a static non-cooperative game of complete information and propose a new ordinal game theory algorithm for finding an optimal generalized Nash equilibrium. The proposed algorithm determines a single ranking of proposals or bidders that takes account of multiple performance criteria and reflects both the public sector and the private sector perspectives, and can handle any number of private sector players and any number of contractual terms. An illustrative scenario is provided to guide the reader through the workings of the proposed ordinal game theory algorithm. The proposed ordinal game theory-based analysis framework can
be used by the private sector to analyse any set of potential proposals most likely to be submitted by bidders and to assist with the choice of bidding strategies, and by the public sector player to analyse any set of potential proposals most likely to be submitted under any set of contractual terms and to assist with the choice of a realistic set of contractual terms and their performance measures.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 314-343 |
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications |
Volume | 169 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 30 Nov 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 Apr 2016 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- Ordinal game theory
- Non-cooperative games
- public–private partnerships
- Generalized Nash equilibria
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An ordinal game theory approach to the analysis and selection of partners in public: Private partnership projects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Jamal Ouenniche
- Business School - Personal Chair in Business Analytics
- Management Science and Business Economics
- Edinburgh Strategic Resilience Initiative
- Credit Research Centre
- Management Science
Person: Academic: Research Active