TY - JOUR
T1 - Approaches, enablers and barriers to govern the private sector in health in low- and middle-income countries
T2 - A scoping review
AU - Goodman, Catherine
AU - Witter, Sophie
AU - Hellowell, Mark
AU - Allen, Louise
AU - Srinivasan, Shuchi
AU - Nixon, Swapna
AU - Burney, Ayesha
AU - Bhattacharjee, Debrupa
AU - Cocozza, Anna
AU - Appleford, Gabrielle
AU - Thabet, Aya
AU - Clarke, David
N1 - DC, GA and AC conceptualised the study, which was designed by CG, SW, MH, LA, SS, DC, GA and AC. SS, SN and AB piloted the screening process, screened the references identified through the database searches, and extracted data from the included articles, with support from CG, SW, MH, LA and DB. CG, SW, MH, LA and SS analysed and synthesised the data and drafted the manuscript, with critical intellectual feedback and support from AC, AT, GA and DC. CG is the paper guarantor. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. ASReview machine learning tool was used to prioritise papers for screening.
PY - 2024/11/13
Y1 - 2024/11/13
N2 - Introduction The private sector plays a substantial role in delivering and financing healthcare in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Supporting governments to govern the private sector effectively, and so improve outcomes across the health system, requires an understanding of the evidence base on private health sector governance. This paper reports on a scoping review, which synthesised evidence on the approaches used to govern private sector delivery and financing of healthcare in LMICs, the effectiveness of these approaches and the key enablers and barriers to strengthening governance. Methods We undertook a systematic search of databases of published articles and grey literature to identify eligible papers published since 2010, drawing on WHO's governance definition. Data were extracted into a pretested matrix and analysed using narrative synthesis, structured by WHO's six governance behaviours and an additional cross-cutting theme on capacities. Results 107 studies were selected as relevant, covering 101 LMICs. Qualitative methods and document/literature review were predominant. The findings demonstrate the relevance of the WHO governance behaviours, but the lack of robust evidence for approaches to implementing them. Valuable insights from the literature include the need for a clear vision around governance aims; the importance of ensuring that policy dialogue processes are inclusive and transparent, avoiding interest group capture; the benefits of exploiting synergies between governance mechanisms; and the need to develop capacity to enact governance among both public and private actors. Conclusion Governance choices shape not just the current health system, but also its future development. Common barriers to effective governance must be addressed in policy design, stakeholder engagement, public and private sector accountability, monitoring and capacity. Achieving this will require in-depth explorations of governance mechanisms and more rigorous documentation of implementation and outcomes in diverse contexts.
AB - Introduction The private sector plays a substantial role in delivering and financing healthcare in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Supporting governments to govern the private sector effectively, and so improve outcomes across the health system, requires an understanding of the evidence base on private health sector governance. This paper reports on a scoping review, which synthesised evidence on the approaches used to govern private sector delivery and financing of healthcare in LMICs, the effectiveness of these approaches and the key enablers and barriers to strengthening governance. Methods We undertook a systematic search of databases of published articles and grey literature to identify eligible papers published since 2010, drawing on WHO's governance definition. Data were extracted into a pretested matrix and analysed using narrative synthesis, structured by WHO's six governance behaviours and an additional cross-cutting theme on capacities. Results 107 studies were selected as relevant, covering 101 LMICs. Qualitative methods and document/literature review were predominant. The findings demonstrate the relevance of the WHO governance behaviours, but the lack of robust evidence for approaches to implementing them. Valuable insights from the literature include the need for a clear vision around governance aims; the importance of ensuring that policy dialogue processes are inclusive and transparent, avoiding interest group capture; the benefits of exploiting synergies between governance mechanisms; and the need to develop capacity to enact governance among both public and private actors. Conclusion Governance choices shape not just the current health system, but also its future development. Common barriers to effective governance must be addressed in policy design, stakeholder engagement, public and private sector accountability, monitoring and capacity. Achieving this will require in-depth explorations of governance mechanisms and more rigorous documentation of implementation and outcomes in diverse contexts.
KW - global health
KW - health policies and all other topics
KW - health policy
KW - health systems
KW - public health
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85213814651
U2 - 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015771
DO - 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015771
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85213814651
SN - 2059-7908
VL - 8
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - BMJ Global Health
JF - BMJ Global Health
IS - Suppl 5
M1 - e015771
ER -