Are simple questions a valid measure of outcome after stroke?

Martin Dennis*, Ian Wellwood, Charles Warlow

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We aimed to farther establish the validity of a novel measure of stroke outcome which has been developed for use in large randomised trials. One hundred and fifty-two survivors from a consecutive series of 266 hospital-admitted stroke patients were interviewed 1 year after their stroke and asked the ’simple questions’ before being assessed using the Barthel Index, Oxford Handicap Scale, Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys Disability Instrument, Frenchay Activities Index, Hodkinson Abbreviated Mental Test score and the General Health Questionnaire. The patients’ or carers’ responses to the question ’Do you/they require help from another person with everyday activities?’ quite accurately predicted their scores on the measures of physical functioning but were less accurate in predicting cognitive or psychological state. Their responses to the question ’Do you fell that you/they have made a complete recovery from your/their stroke?’ predicted their physical functioning best but less well than the ’dependency’ question. Our results suggest that ’simple questions’ may be a reasonably valid measure of functional outcome after stroke.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-27
Number of pages6
JournalCerebrovascular diseases
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1997

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • Barthel Index
  • Disability
  • Prognosis
  • Validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are simple questions a valid measure of outcome after stroke?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this