TY - CHAP
T1 - Artificial intelligence and the imperative of responsibility
T2 - Reconceiving AI governance as social care
AU - Vallor, Shannon
AU - Ganesh, Bhargavi
N1 - /
PY - 2023/11/7
Y1 - 2023/11/7
N2 - The accelerating development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems has generated acute and interlinked challenges for social trust, responsibility ascription, and governance. While today’s AI tools lack the type of agency that can bear responsibility, they are deployed in ways that create novel configurations and social appearances of agential power. That is, they allow new things to be done by us, for us, and to us, in ways that do not easily fit our existing practices for governing moral and legal responsibility. This is commonly referred to as the problem of AI ‘responsibility gaps’. We confront this challenge by framing normative responsibility in a new way: not as a fact about agents to be discovered, nor a set of criteria that responsible agents must satisfy, but as a relational practice of social care in the exercise of power, that responds to others’ vulnerability to our power. Drawing from examples in steamboat engineering, consumer finance, and environmental governance, we highlight how responsibility gaps have historically generated the moral and political imperative to construct new forms of responsible agency to balance novel agential powers, of which AI is merely the latest iteration.
AB - The accelerating development of artificial intelligence (AI) systems has generated acute and interlinked challenges for social trust, responsibility ascription, and governance. While today’s AI tools lack the type of agency that can bear responsibility, they are deployed in ways that create novel configurations and social appearances of agential power. That is, they allow new things to be done by us, for us, and to us, in ways that do not easily fit our existing practices for governing moral and legal responsibility. This is commonly referred to as the problem of AI ‘responsibility gaps’. We confront this challenge by framing normative responsibility in a new way: not as a fact about agents to be discovered, nor a set of criteria that responsible agents must satisfy, but as a relational practice of social care in the exercise of power, that responds to others’ vulnerability to our power. Drawing from examples in steamboat engineering, consumer finance, and environmental governance, we highlight how responsibility gaps have historically generated the moral and political imperative to construct new forms of responsible agency to balance novel agential powers, of which AI is merely the latest iteration.
KW - responsibility gaps
KW - autonomous systems
KW - AI governance
UR - https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003282242
U2 - 10.4324/9781003282242-43
DO - 10.4324/9781003282242-43
M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)
SN - 9781032252391
T3 - Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy
SP - 395
EP - 406
BT - The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Responsibility
A2 - Kiener, Maximilian
PB - Routledge
CY - New York, NY
ER -