Assay precision and risk of misclassification at rule-out cut-offs for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin

Peter A Kavsak*, Nicholas L Mills, Lorna Clark, Dennis Ko, Sameer Sharif, Annabel Chen-Tournoux, Steven M. Friedman, Emilie P. Belley-Cote, Andrew Worster, Jafna Cox, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Amy Lou, Jennifer Taher, Frank Scheuermeyer, Chris Mccudden, Beth L Abramson, Shaun Eintracht, Jennifer L. Shea, Paul M. Yip, Yun HuangMichael Chen, Albert K.y. Tsui, Laurel Thorlacius, Kristin M Aakre, Joshua E. Raizman, Angela W.s. Fung, Karin H Humphries, Saranya Arnoldo, Vipin Bhayana, Rose Djiana, Daniel R. Beriault, Julie St-Cyr, Ronald A. Booth, David W. Blank, Marco L.a. Sivilotti, Allan S Jaffe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Clinical trials and guidelines support the use of very low high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) results to rule-out a myocardial infarction (MI) ( 1) ). The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Committee on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers committee, through a modeling approach, suggests assays need to have a lower limit near 3 ng/L and an analytical variation of 10% below 7 ng/L if these low values are to perform consistently in practice ( 2) ). Our objectives for the present study were to assess: i) if any type of instrument or individual instrument could achieve a coefficient of variation (CV) of ≤10% at very low hs-cTn cut-offs (i.e., targets) recommended in clinical pathways; ii) the frequency of results at the hs-cTn target, above the target and below the target, with the latter group representing potential misclassification to the low risk group where the target level would in the intermediate risk range.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCanadian journal of cardiology
Early online date13 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 May 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assay precision and risk of misclassification at rule-out cut-offs for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this