Assessing individual-level change in dementia research: A review of methodologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Whether in the context of monitoring disease progression or in assessing the effects of interventions, a major challenge in dementia research is determining when an individual has undergone meaningful change in symptoms and other relevant outcomes such as cognitive test performance. The challenge lies in differentiating genuine improvement or deterioration from change in scores due to random and systematic error.
Body: In this review, we discuss the advantages and limitations of available methods for assessing individual-level change in the context of key challenges, including imperfect and differential reliability of scores, and practice effects. We discuss indices of reliable change and the use of composite and item response theory (IRT) scores.
Conclusion: We conclude that IRT-based approaches hold particular promise because they have the flexibility to accommodate solutions to a wide range of issues that influence the accuracy of judgements of meaningful change. We close by discussing the practical implications of adopting IRT based approaches
Original languageEnglish
Article number26
JournalAlzheimer's Research and Therapy
Volume13
Early online date15 Jan 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's
  • dementia
  • reliable change
  • individual-level change
  • item response theory

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing individual-level change in dementia research: A review of methodologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this