Assessing research outcomes by postal questionnaire with telephone follow-up

Cj Parker, Me Dewey, John Gladman, Avril Drummond, Michael Dewey, Nadina Lincoln, Chris Parker, Philippa Logan, Kate Radford, Anil Sharma, Caroline Watkins, Michael Leathley, Hazel Dickinson, Elaine Mackie, Jan Rhodes, Liz Lightbody, Julie Murray, Geralyn Lennon, Carol Mullarkey, Hazel McCormickVal Chisnall, Sean McCann, Meg Birch, Helen Smith, Dave Gamm, Mary Vincent, Sally Chorlton, Dee Sessions, Martin Dennis, Alison Chalmers, Lesley Moffat, Peter Langhorne, Joyce Peters, Karen Blackwood, Louise Gilbertson, David Barer, Susan Fall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background. Face-to-face assessment of research outcomes is expensive and may introduce bias. Postal questionnaires offer a cheaper alternative which avoids observer bias, but non-response and incomplete response reduce the effective sample size and may be equally serious sources of bias. This study examines the extent and potential effects of missing data in the postal collection of outcomes for a large rehabilitation trial. Methods. Questionnaires containing a number of established scales were posted to participants in a trial of occupational therapy after stroke. Response was maximized by telephone and postal reminders, and incomplete questionnaires were followed up by telephone. Scale scores obtained by imputing values to questionnaire items missing on return were compared with those achieved by telephone follow-up. Findings. Response to the initial posting was 60%, rising to 85% after reminders. Participants receiving the experimental treatment were more likely to respond without a reminder. There were no significant differences on any known factors between eventual responders and non-responders. Of the questionnaires, 43% were incomplete on return: partial responders were significantly different to complete responders on baseline disability and home circumstances. Of the incomplete questionnaires, 71% were resolved by telephone follow-up. In these, the scale scores achieved by telephone were generally higher than those derived by conventional imputation. Conclusion. Postal outcome assessment achieved a good response rate, but considerable effort was needed to minimize non-response and incomplete response, both of which could have been serious sources of bias.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1065-1069
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Epidemiology
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Keywords

  • Bias postal questionnaires
  • Research outcomes
  • Stroke therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing research outcomes by postal questionnaire with telephone follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this