Assessment of capillary suction time (CST) test methodologies

O Sawalha, M Scholz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The capillary suction time (CST) test is a commonly used method to measure the filterability and the easiness of removing moisture from slurry and sludge in numerous environmental and industrial applications. This study assessed several novel alterations of both the test methodology and the current standard capillary suction time (CST) apparatus. Twelve different papers including the standard Whatman No. 17 chromatographic paper were tested. The tests were run using four different types of sludge including a synthetic sludge, which was specifically developed for benchmarking purposes. The standard apparatus was altered by the introduction of a novel rectangular funnel instead of a standard circular one. A stirrer was also introduced to solve the problem of test inconsistency (e.g. high CST variability) particularly for heavy types of sludge. Results showed that several alternative papers, which are cheaper than the standard paper, can be used to estimate CST values accurately, and that the test repeatability can be improved in many cases and for different types of sludge. The introduction of the rectangular funnel demonstrated an obvious enhancement of test repeatability. The use of a stirrer to avoid sedimentation of heavy sludge did not have statistically significant impact on the CST values or the corresponding data variability. The application of synthetic sludge can support the testing of experimental methodologies and should be used for subsequent benchmarking purposes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1377-86
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume28
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Keywords

  • Filtration
  • Paper
  • Random Allocation
  • Sewage
  • Waste Disposal, Fluid

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of capillary suction time (CST) test methodologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this