Abstract
Genotype-based resistance assays are commonly used to aid treatment in HIV-infected individuals failing antiretroviral therapy. The relationship between genotype and antiretroviral therapy comes mostly from in vitro assays of the response to a single drugs although there is a need for a prediction of clinical response to combination therapy. We have compared three different methods of analysing genotype data as a predictor of clinical response in a small clinical cohort of highly antiretroviral-experienced individuals failing therapy. No method performed well beyond 8 weeks into a new therapeutic regimen. A model based on the number of 'primary' mutations was statistically significant, but a multiple regression model, which identified specific mutations explained threefold more variation in response. Optimal prediction in this dataset was given by a model obtained from a classification tree analysis, in which genotype at amino acid sites 135 and 202 were combined with amino acid site 184, which explained over 50% of the deviance in the data and had a classification success of 86%.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 151-157 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Antiviral Therapy |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2002 |
Keywords
- Adult
- Amino Acid Sequence
- Anti-HIV Agents
- Drug Resistance, Viral
- Female
- Genetic Variation
- Genotype
- HIV
- HIV Infections
- HIV Protease
- HIV Reverse Transcriptase
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Models, Biological
- Mutation
- Phylogeny
- Retrospective Studies