Authors' response: Enactivism, cognitive science and the Jonasian inference

Dave Ward, Mario Villalobos

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review


In our target article we claimed that, at least since Weber and Varela, enactivism has incorporated a theoretical commitment to one important aspect of Jonas's philosophical biology, namely its anthropomorphism which is at odds with the methodological commitments of modern science. In this general reply we want to clarify what we mean by (Jonasian) anthropomorphism, and explain why we think it is incompatible with science. We do this by spelling out what we call the "Jonasian inference," i.e. the idea that we are entitled, based on our first-person experience of teleology, to take the appearance of teleology in other living beings at face value.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-233
JournalConstructivist Foundations
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'Authors' response: Enactivism, cognitive science and the Jonasian inference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this