Avoiding emissions versus creating sinks—Effectiveness and attractiveness to climate finance

Mathew Williams, Dave Reay, Pete Smith*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

The perception of greater impact via new sinks, as opposed to through avoided emissions, has already led some large investors to focus on sink-related projects. This is a flawed perception when applied universally and carries a risk that effective routes to mitigation through avoiding emissions are side-lined. In reality, both emissions avoidance and emissions removal are needed, and both can be a cost-effective means of delivering mitigation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2046-2049
Number of pages4
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume29
Issue number8
Early online date26 Jan 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2023

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • avoided emissions
  • carbon sinks
  • climate change mitigation
  • natural climate solutions
  • nature based solutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Avoiding emissions versus creating sinks—Effectiveness and attractiveness to climate finance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this