Aye or naw, whit dae ye hink? Scottish independence and linguistic identity on social media

Philippa Shoemark, Debnil Sur, Luke Shrimpton, Iain Murray, Sharon Goldwater

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Political surveys have indicated a relationship between a sense of Scottish identity and voting decisions in the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum. Identity is often reflected in language use, suggesting the intuitive hypothesis that individuals who support Scottish independence are more likely to use distinctively Scottish words than those who oppose it. In the first large-scale study of sociolinguistic variation on social media in the UK, we identify distinctively Scottish terms in a data-driven way, and find that these terms are indeed used at a higher rate by users of pro-independence hashtags than by users of anti-independence hashtags. However, we also find that in general people are less likely to use distinctively Scottish words in tweets with referendum-related hashtags than in their general Twitter activity. We attribute this difference to style-shifting relative to audience, aligning with previous work showing that Twitter users tend to use fewer local variants when addressing a broader audience.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEuropean Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2017)
Place of PublicationValencia, Spain
PublisherAssociation for Computational Linguistics
Pages1239–1248
Number of pages10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Apr 2017
Event15th EACL 2017 Software Demonstrations - Valencia, Spain
Duration: 3 Apr 20177 Apr 2017
http://eacl2017.org/
http://eacl2017.org/index.php

Conference

Conference15th EACL 2017 Software Demonstrations
Abbreviated titleEACL 2017
Country/TerritorySpain
CityValencia
Period3/04/177/04/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aye or naw, whit dae ye hink? Scottish independence and linguistic identity on social media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this