Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Backward anaphora in L2 acquisition of English, Mandarin and Japanese

Yi-ching Su*, Antonella Sorace, Yuki Hirose, Keiko Mochizuki, Makiko Hirakawa, Mineharu Nakayama, Chia-hsing Chen, Ho-Yun Hsieh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study reports findings from two experiments on backward anaphora by second language (L2) learners of English, Mandarin, and Japanese, examining the effects of first language (L1) systems and whether a pronoun resolution pattern requiring syntax–discourse integration can be successfully acquired. The findings from Experiment 1 comparing English and Mandarin demonstrate that the availability of positive evidence for Mandarin-speaking learners of L2 English allows them to achieve a native-like pattern, whereas it is difficult even for advanced English-speaking learners of L2 Mandarin to acquire the syntax–discourse integration pattern that Mandarin requires. Experiment 2 compared two languages that show the syntax–discourse integration condition for backward anaphora (Japanese and Mandarin) to further investigate (1) whether L2 speakers were influenced by their L1 patterns, or (2) whether a pattern as in English, i.e. not requiring syntax–discourse integration, would emerge regardless of the L1s. The findings from Experiment 2 reveal an effect of L1 system because the Mandarin-speaking learners of L2 Japanese, the Japanese-speaking learners of L2 Mandarin, and the two groups of native speakers display similar patterns of interpretation.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages26
JournalSecond Language Research
Early online date2 Apr 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Apr 2025

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • backward anaphora
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Mandarin
  • second language acquisition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Backward anaphora in L2 acquisition of English, Mandarin and Japanese'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this