Beastly: What Makes Animal Metaphors Offensive?

Nick Haslam*, Steve Loughnan, Pamela Sun

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Animal metaphors convey a wide range of meanings, from insulting slurs to expressions of love. Two studies examined factors contributing to the offensiveness of these metaphors. Study 1 examined 40 common metaphors, finding that their meanings were diverse but centered on depravity, disagreeableness, and stupidity. Their offensiveness was predicted by the revulsion felt toward the animal and by the dehumanizing view of the target that it implied. Study 2 examined contextual factors in metaphor use, finding that the offensiveness of animal metaphors varies with the tone of their expression and the gender and in-group/out-group status of their targets. These variations influence offensiveness by altering the extent to which the target is ascribed animalistic properties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)311-325
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Language and Social Psychology
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2011

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • dehumanization
  • gender
  • metaphor
  • offensiveness
  • IMPLICIT ASSOCIATIONS
  • SELF
  • DEHUMANIZATION
  • INTERGROUP
  • SIMULATION
  • HUMANNESS
  • OUTGROUPS
  • CRITICISM
  • RELEVANCE
  • OTHERS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beastly: What Makes Animal Metaphors Offensive?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this