Between Blasphemy and Judicial Activism: Jesus and the Mosaic Law

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

It has been authoritatively demonstrated that Jesus was charged with blasphemy by the Sanhedrin based on the assumption that he was teaching his followers to disregard the Law. In their defence of Jesus' role as a teacher of the Law, St. Augustine and St. Thomas strived to reject this reading, resorting to the distinction between law-making and interpretation of the law. This approach is a common place of modern legal studies, and through an assessment of the current debate on judicial activism in certain areas of international law, it is possible – in retrospect – to reframe and appreciate Augustine and Thomas' effort, as well as to fully understand the historical and legal profile of Jesus' indictment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)469-487
JournalInternational Journal of Private Law
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • Mosaic law
  • Moses
  • World Trade Organization
  • WTO
  • Saint Thomas
  • New Testament
  • Bible
  • religion
  • incomplete contracts
  • blasphemy
  • Jesus Christ
  • judicial activism
  • Biblical History
  • Sanhedrin
  • law teachers
  • law making
  • legal interpretation
  • legal studies
  • international law
  • historical profiles
  • legal profiles
  • indictments
  • Old Testament
  • religious leaders
  • private law


Dive into the research topics of 'Between Blasphemy and Judicial Activism: Jesus and the Mosaic Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this