Abstract
Frost's claim that universal models of reading require linguistically diverse data is relevant and justified. We support it with evidence demonstrating the extent of the bias towards some Indo-European languages and alphabetic scripts in scientific literature. However, some of his examples are incorrect, and he neglects the complex interaction of writing system and language structure with history and cultural environment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 280-281 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2012 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- brain
- humans
- neurological models
- reading
- recognition (Psychology)
- semantics