Beyond the disruption narrative: Varieties and ambiguities of energy system change

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

For many observers we are entering an age of heightened disruption in energy systems – a ‘disruption narrative’ is now prominent and seemingly widely-shared. The energy disruption narrative often goes beyond the merely descriptive: it is also often used in a normative way, in that system disruption is seen as a necessary and welcome enabler of the shift to more sustainable and more rapidly decarbonised energy systems. While not denying that there are significant changes underway in the operation and governance of energy systems, I reflect here on the assumptions associated with the disruption narrative and its value as a guide to policy and research. I firstly review some theoretical and empirical research on disruptive innovation, consider some empirical evidence on historic energy system change, and then reflect on the value of a disruptive narrative in ‘energy futures’ research and policy. The disruption narrative is a contestable framing for researchers, across both ‘whole systems’ analysis and more specific technological and organisational level study, and is a problematic guide for policy.Researchers and policymakers should be sceptical of uniform narratives about change, and seek more balanced attention to both disruptive and continuity-based dynamics of energy system change and sustainable transitions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)232-237
Number of pages6
JournalEnergy Research & Social Science
Volume37
Early online date28 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018

Keywords

  • energy
  • Innovation
  • continuity
  • disruption

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond the disruption narrative: Varieties and ambiguities of energy system change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this