Beyond the EDGE with EDAM: Prioritising British Plant Species According to Evolutionary Distinctiveness, and Accuracy and Magnitude of Decline

William D. Pearse, Mark W. Chase, Michael J. Crawley, Konrad Dolphin, Michael F. Fay, Jeffrey A. Joseph, Gary Powney, Chris D. Preston, Giovanni Rapacciuolo, David B. Roy, Andy Purvis, Robert Guralnick (Editor)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Conservation biologists have only finite resources, and so must prioritise some species over others. The EDGE-listing approach ranks species according to their combined evolutionary distinctiveness and degree of threat, but ignores the uncertainty surrounding both threat and evolutionary distinctiveness. We develop a new family of measures for species, which we name EDAM, that incorporates evolutionary distinctiveness, the magnitude of decline, and the accuracy with which decline can be predicted. Further, we show how the method can be extended to explore phyogenetic uncertainty. Using the vascular plants of Britain as a case study, we find that the various EDAM measures emphasise different species and parts of Britain, and that phylogenetic uncertainty can strongly affect the prioritisation scores of some species.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e0126524
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 May 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond the EDGE with EDAM: Prioritising British Plant Species According to Evolutionary Distinctiveness, and Accuracy and Magnitude of Decline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this