Birth choice following primary Caesarean Section: Mothers' perceptions of the influence of health professionals on decision‐making

Karen Goodall, Chris McVittie, Michelle Magill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

This study explored mothers' perceptions of the influences of health professionals (GPs, midwives and consultants) on decisions as to mode of delivery of second children, following a previous Caesarean section (CS). Qualitative semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 10 pregnant women (31–40 years), expecting a second child following a first delivery by Caesarean section (20–40 weeks gestation). Interpretative phenomenological analysis revealed four themes accounting for participants' understandings of relevant influences. Participants regarded themselves as: (1) lacking relevant knowledge to make an informed choice, (2) obtaining probabilistic information, and (3) receiving latent communication from health professionals regarding choice of mode of delivery. Their perceived response was (4) to relinquish control over the mode of second delivery to the health professionals involved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-14
JournalJournal of reproductive and infant psychology
Volume27
Issue number1
Early online date21 Feb 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • decision-making
  • healthcare professionals
  • birth choice
  • caesarean section
  • VBAC

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Birth choice following primary Caesarean Section: Mothers' perceptions of the influence of health professionals on decision‐making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this