Bootstrap and Rollback: Generalizing Epistemic Circularity

Jesper Kallestrup

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Reliabilists accept the possibility of basic knowledge—knowledge that p in virtue of the reliability of some belief-producing process r without antecedent knowledge that r is reliable. Cohen (Philos Phenomenol Res 65:309–329, 2002, Philos Phenomenol Res 70:417–430, 2005) and Vogel (J Philos 97:602–623, 2000, J Philos 105:518–539, 2008) have argued that one can bootstrap knowledge that r is reliable from basic knowledge. This paper provides a diagnosis of epistemic bootstrapping, and then shows that recent attempts at embracing bootstrapped knowledge are found wanting. Instead it is argued that such arguments are afflicted by a novel kind of generalized epistemic circularity. The ensuing view is defended against various objections, and an explanation of the source of that circularity is offered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-413
Number of pages18
JournalSynthese
Volume189
Issue number2
Early online date9 Aug 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bootstrap and Rollback: Generalizing Epistemic Circularity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this